My Financial Elements CA

Looking for:

Max/Msp | NI Community Forum

Click here to Download


Remember Me? The No. Today’s Posts competitions support us FAQ advertise our advertisers newsletter. When you buy products through links across our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Learn more. Thank you Gearspace. Reaktor versus Max. In my case I want to make my own synth sounds as deep as I can so it is not about the learning curve, more about possibilities and the maximum of versatility.

Thanks in advance. Best regards, Juljan. My Studio. They look similar, but are actually quite different Reaktor is what you are looking for, if you just want to make your own synths. It has better sounding built-in “pieces” oscillators and filters and a very flexible environment for putting them together. This is especially true in R6, where they introduced the “Blocks” functionality! Personally, I find it a bit less elegant than MAX in terms of “patching workflow”, but it makes up for that in other ways.

MAX is really better for creating whole “environments” than single-use units like synthesizers. Reaktor 6 vs max 8 free isn’t to say they can’t be done – they certainly can – but it is kinda “overkill” for that. There is also the issue of needing to program oscillators and filters if you want to match the SQ of Reaktor or stand-alone. That being said, MAX is читать полностью a lot of ways less “intimidating” in terms of workflow, because its environment is insanely well thought-out and intuitive Hope that helps a bit!

I’m gonna answer these questions in a bit of a reverse order, reaktor 6 vs max 8 free stick with me: Quote:. I already spent some time using Reaktor 5. Of course blocks are a big step forward, it seems easier creating sounds with it but for me it is – as I said – about versatility and the depth of the program. I’m gonna answer these questions in a bit of a reverse order, so stick with me: I think you’re asking the wrong question.

The truth is that they are pretty “comparable”, in terms of learning workflow – if you learn one, you’ll have a decent grasp on the other far more quickly than if you had no experience with either. The important thing to remember is that they are both extremely deep programs and decidedly different in application, but also very similar in execution.

Reaktor is more intended to be a “plug-in environment”. It doesn’t really stand on its own, it needs a host to be most effective. It is geared towards – and has the built-in tools numero de serie autodesk 3ds 2014 – building instruments and effects to be used in a “production ecosystem”.

It also is much more “plug-and-play” than MAX, having a much higher quality built-in library of higher-level signal components. That being said, it isn’t really the best environment for either learning to build or building synths, because in its generality it also gains overhead. It isn’t all that CPU efficient unless you debug a lot and code at lower levels, oftenand it is hard to get your products working in traditional production environments outside Ableton Live, and even then there are limitations.

That being said I find it much easier to get started with than “raw programming” in Reaktor working with Blocks or higher-level objects is easier in NI’s programand the documentation is 2nd to none So all in all, I’d say that they are very different from each other, but both worth knowing. I’ll get to my actual answer after addressing your other points Reaktor 6 massively improved the “synth building experience”, as well as really upping the quality of available high-level objects. With 6, it isn’t really an issue.

Reaktor 6 vs max 8 free is one half of what I see as your problem – you admit that you would find Blocks, a unikuely-Reaktor-produkt, extremely helpful in what you want to do, yet you worry that MAX reaktor 6 vs max 8 free a “deeper and more versatile program” I implore you, please don’t worry about that! It will take you They are both essentially infinitely deep programs! As a caveat, there is a strong argument that MAX is the “deeper” program, simply because it is a stand-alone environment.

It is designed to build entire products from the ground up – there is nothing stopping you from coding a [rudimentary] DAW in MAX! Well, that is, other than the major CPU issues with largish projects. The thing is, what is it that you, personally, are trying to do? You say that you want to build synths. Do you want to be forced to code your own oscillators, either in pure math or C? Because that is what you’ll get to rather quickly in MAX. You can do that the C, not the math – Gen is awesome, and Reaktor has nothing close in Reaktor, too, but the built-in objects are much higher quality.

Do you want to use your synth in a larger production environment? As in, as a plug-in in a DAW? Then Reaktor is far superior. Sure, you can compile MAX patchers into plugins, but it is far from seamless – and MFL has its own downsides, so the thought of building it in MAX and using it in Live isn’t as easy as you might think So, which do I recommend?

Truth be told, Reaktor 6. I love MAX for what it action director pc free, but it isn’t the best for those wanting to build their own effects and synths for traditional production. If I were you, I’d not worry in the slightest about “depth” – while MAX may in theory may be “deeper”, in practice it is impossible to reach the bottom of either program, reaktor 6 vs max 8 free больше информации is a moot point.

Eventually, if you love this way of working – the patching, I mean – you should get both. MAX is a great deal of fun, and very inspiring, to work with. That being said, it is much better as a “stand-alone environment” for building entire projects than it is as something to build components of a larger work Thanks again for answering in detail.

I think I got your point. Because I looked up a little bit around these things I found out that there is also some open source with SuperCollider and Pure Reaktor 6 vs max 8 free. SuperCollider is more like “Live Reaktor 6 vs max 8 free than anything else.

These are not the droids you are looking for. There lie dragons. And so on. Live coding is a very different thing than working with visual-object-oriented programming, and frankly is more of a “performance art gimmick” than a real tool for making real music There are of course exceptions, but they are the exceptions reaktor 6 vs max 8 free prove the rule.

Live Coding is performance читать больше. Live Patching can be performance art, but also can be used in musically useful ways. Pure Data is a fork off an early version of MAX that got a life of its own. It is pseudo-open-source and documented as such. If you are serious about learning to code, then they are comparable, but if you are reaktor 6 vs max 8 free about learning how to build synths, then MAX is miles ahead.

If you are serious about learning this stuff, don’t hobble yourself by trying to go the cheap route. MAX’s big draw reaktor 6 vs max 8 free the insanely useful and well-thought-out documentation. Pure Data lacks anything of the sort, not to mention a lot of the very useful high-level tools for actual creation that MAX has added over the past few versions Gen, most notably.

Though let me reiterate, if you are trying to design usable synths for musical application, Reaktor is almost certainly the best tool for the job. Documentation is everything when it comes to learning a programing language, and MAX has it where PD does not. SC, Tidal, vvvv, and so on are something else entirely! I quote everything Paul says I just want to add that if your curious about patching software for creating synths you should have reaktor 6 vs max 8 free look at Reaktor 6 vs max 8 free.

It’s free, based reaktor 6 vs max 8 free puredata, sounds good and it’s pretty simple to set up. Diogo C. The Vogon Captain is instructing everyone to use Core, not Blocks. It’s free, based on puredata, sounds good and it’s pretty simple to set up Keep that up, and I’ll quote my poetry at you!

Yes, I know, technically Blocks are built from Core components – which is sorta the point, really. Blocks lets you get “up and running” very quickly, then break them apart and tinker. I shall remove the Babel fish from my ear. So they are. That’s great, I can fiddle around with or pinch stuff from their internals. Hmm, it runs audio rate stuff at the native sample rate, and control stuff at whatever the control rate is set to? Also it can be run at higher than the native sample reaktor 6 vs max 8 free through the oversampling options.

Oh freddled gruntbuggly, Thy micturations are to me, As plurdled gabbleblotchits, On reaktor 6 vs max 8 free lurgid bee, That mordiously hath blurted out, Its earted jurtles, Into a rancid festering confectious organ squealer. Or else I shall rend thee in the gobberwarts with my blurglecruncheon, See if I don’t! Oh I made the same mistake at first, upon installing Reaktor 6 – then I “broke one open”, so to speak, and a whole lot of possibilities opened up!

Beneath the shiny, well-designed reaktor 6 vs max 8 free slept a world of modules ripe for the pinching



How to build a synth in Max for Live | MusicRadar – Customize and control Ableton Live with your own Max For Live Devices


Re: max for live vs reaktor Post by HeadrickProductions » Thu May 20, pm was looking for more specific reasons, but thanks for the start i guess i was looking for some things people have done that they could not get done with reaktor or max on it’s own. Last edited by HeadrickProductions on Thu May 20, pm, edited 1 time in total.

Re: max for live vs reaktor Post by Tone Deft » Thu May 20, pm try a forum search, this has been beat to death. In my life Why do I smile At people who I’d much rather kick in the eye? Re: max for live vs reaktor Post by Tone Deft » Thu May 20, pm HeadrickProductions wrote: i guess i was looking for some things people have done that they could not get done with reaktor or max on it’s own. Re: max for live vs reaktor Post by kb » Thu May 20, pm Tone Deft wrote: both have their strengths.

Re: max for live vs reaktor Post by drewbixcube » Thu May 20, pm HeadrickProductions wrote: The question is what can max for live do that reaktor 5 can’t. Re: max for live vs reaktor Post by 3dot Reaktor has a lot of nice pre-built ensembles, both from NI and from the user community. Blinksonic Collidz, new Reaktor 6 Synthesizer ensemble pairs 4 unique engines with a polyrhythmic sequencer with 12 scaled or micrtonal notes. Reaktor 6 by Native Instruments is not just a modular synth but a fascinating […].

Fors Kit is a new collection of four unique Max For Live devices made for exploring melodies, textures, rhythms, and spaces in new ways. There is a plugin for everything. Many forget that you already […]. If you are looking for a super affordable way to learn modular synthesis, Andrew […]. K-Devices lifts the modulation level in Ableton Live with its new Modulators 21, a supercharged modulation M4L toolbox with 6 new advanced devices.

The Max development environment is very popular among experimental musicians. This article dives into this, by comparing the Push 2 with other. Check out our blogpost about this culture. More To Explore. Diveakssh Schae August 18, Is Push the ultimate Ableton controller?

Diveakssh Schae August 12, Art of the Super Producer. Rated 0 out of 5. Ableton for Guitarists. Producers Skills. I like that, I’m learning about synthesis, Im reading a PD tutorial thats pretty good too start. The quality is as low or as high as you could want it to be. Razor sounds nice and has a very simple interface compared to Massive. If you are just looking for presets For sound building, both are also great for that. Reaktor’s true power is the ability to expand on an existing idea or create something new outright.

The commercial potential in Reaktor is always there as anything can be built and you can avoid sounding dated vs. Massive will always sound like Massive, and you can use it to create pads, drums, basses, whatever. But the sound engine to me sounds distinct, where Reaktor can sound like Massive, Nord, Access Virus, or anything else you want to emulate.


$99 reaktor vs $ max/msp educational – MOD WIGGLER – Similar Threads

I shall have to explore further. It isn’t all that CPU efficient unless you debug a lot and code at lower levels, often , and it is hard to get your products working in traditional production environments outside Ableton Live, and even then there are limitations. I have used reaktor since 1. That being said, the modules themselves do actually sound quite good and act predictably, which makes building “software modular” stuff very convenient, without actually sacrificing sound quality. Post by colb » Sat Nov 30, pm peripatitis wrote: colb wrote: peripatitis wrote: colb wrote: peripatitis wrote: Max offers a lot more than reaktor, there is no comparison really

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *